521 Pension Blog

Back to Home Print This Page Email This Page
Pension Blog

Pension Blog

Welcome to the 521 Pension Blog, a forum where SEIU members can exchange ideas, news, and concerns we have on the topic of pension.

Opinion: Reform pension rules but don't cut benefits to hardworking people

By Kristy Sermersheim

Special to the Mercury News
Posted: 03/09/2010 04:39:44 PM PST
Updated: 03/09/2010 07:29:16 PM PST

Like 401(k)s and other investments, pensions took a hit during the recent market crash due to the abuses of mortgage companies and Wall Street brokers. But that's not a reason to strip hardworking employees of retirement security; instead, it's a reason to make sure our economy recovers in a responsible way so that pensions and retirement savings -- the safety net for millions of Americans -- are not decimated.

 

Click here to post a comment.

The current attacks on retirement security, including Santa Clara County Assessor Larry Stone's Feb. 27 op-ed on public employee pensions ("Reform California pensions, or taxpayers will revolt -- again"), miss this big picture and pick the wrong targets.

For instance, it has become common practice for high-level managers to amass six-figure annual pension payouts with one hand, while pointing fingers at rank and file workers with the other. As a former Santa Clara County worker, and as a union leader who has bargained contracts for thousands of employees, I can assure you that public workers are not retiring in luxury. The average public sector employee, in fact, will receive $25,000 a year in retirement, and the majority of public sector workers will retire without Social Security or retirement health care benefits.

But if Mr. Stone and others are successful in rewriting the rules, it will be line workers who will pay the price for the excesses of others.

A smarter approach is to take a hard look at where the abuses are taking place and make real corrections there. That's why the Service Employees International Union supports reforms to curb "spiking," the exploitation of vacation time and other loopholes to dramatically increase a retiree's pension, and "double-dipping," the practice of retiring, collecting a pension, then getting rehired the next day as an independent contractor. These practices damage the integrity of the system we count on for security in our retirement, and we need to stop them.

If Mr. Stone is serious about curbing pension excess, he should support these important reforms -- beginning in his own backyard. Two assessor's office employees are simultaneously receiving CalPERS retirement checks and taxpayer-funded salary -- unfortunately a common practice for upper management in the county.

Stone predicts a ballot-box revolution against retirement security for public employees, and yet, ironically, a ballot measure to cut public pensions was abandoned recently by its authors. The effort floundered not for lack of people who want to target pensions, but because potential donors looked at the data and saw that the public strongly supports retirement security and opposes cutting the modest pensions of nurses, social workers and park workers and forcing them to retire in poverty.

The public understands that pensions are a crucial part of our social fabric. State and local pensions do more than provide a critical source of reliable income for 7.3 million retired Americans. They also support 2.5 million American jobs, generate $358 billion in economic activity and result in $57 billion in federal, state and local tax revenue.

Whether in the private or public sectors, everyone who works hard and plays by the rules deserves security in retirement -- and this recession has taught us that 401(k)s won't cut it. The best, most affordable and most secure method of providing a steady income retirement is through pensions.

Instead of stoking the politics of resentment based on crumbling retirement security in the private sector, we need to make sure that more Americans are able to retire with the dignity and security that a pension provides.

KRISTY SERMERSHEIM is chief elected officer of the Service Employees" International Union Local 521, representing more than 52,000 employees in the public sector. She wrote this article for this newspaper.

 

Posted by: Kristy Sermersheim, SEIU 521 CEO on 3/9/2010 at 4:39:00 PM

Attacks in Santa Clara County

Comments

Monica

Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:00:00 AM

Workers like any others deserve time off as well....

Rod Fields

Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:05:18 AM

No executive or top manager receiving a pension through Cal PERS should be allowed to receive more than 5% above the average median retirement of all those receiving a pension from this plan; they are most able to support their future options and it shouldn't be on the backs of those who earn the least; everyone should be able to retire after 20-30 years and receive more than a poverty retirement of $25,000 average.  Too many of these individuals waste time on the job engaged in non-work activities, meaning they don't deserve the pay they receive, nor the associated pension.  And those who do retire, should not be allowed to return to work for the same employer, or not with additional pension benefits.

Jim Heaney

Friday, March 12, 2010 7:33:37 PM

Thanks for questioning their "facts".  You mention that the average retirement is $25,000 per year.  Is this all retirees including management? If it is then this number is also inflated.  I would like to know what the median (not average) retirement of general rep employees are for CalPERS retirees.  I don't want our median retirement amount skewed by the spiking salaries of executive managers. 

Nancy Elliott

Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:52:30 PM

Great op-ed  piece., and  I think the Union needs to ramp it up.  For true, enduring reform, we need to propose a cap on pensions! The public does not have the means to sustain the outrageous pensions that managers walk away with.  Let's cap them or tax them!    

Darlene Brannen

Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:57:44 PM

I am so glad to see that our union has made a well written and powerful response to Larry Stone's pension-bashing op-ed piece.  This helps educate the public of the true facts regarding public pensions and corrects the distorted picture that opportunistic politicians try to depict regarding the problems with the budegt.   

Gilbert Villareal

Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:52:41 PM

As a former employee of Santa Clara County in the Assessor's Office, I witnessed first hand the double-dipping of retirees.  Even as a new employee I thought it was wrong for the retiree to retire, collect their pension and stay on as an independant contractor for long periods of time.  I am not just talking about 1 month, I am talking about 6 months to over a year. 



It doesn't surprise me that Mr. Stone continues to attack SEIU members.  As an employee of his office, SEIU was always on the defense of its members because of the management style that is old, archaic and reminiscent of 1980's corporation management. 



Because of people like Mr. Stone, our public is fed a narrow version of the truth.  I was making $15 an hour when I started in 2004, which was not even enough to have an apartment of my own, but I was thankful that I had a full-time job and stability.  I went to work for the County not because it paid well, but because at the end of 30 years of public service or more, I'd hope to reap the benefits of serving the County and its citizens.  A person that works in public service is not doing it to become rich. 



I encourage members of the public to really research on their own what most rank-and-file employees receive when they retire. 

Zenaida Velasquez

Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:23:39 PM

Great article Kristy! We need to fight in block to defeat Larry's Stone intentions. The names of those two guys working in his Dept also need to be revealed. Employees like them who are double-dipping are the people taking the bread away from the majority.

Post a Comment

Comments may not appear immediately after posting.

SEIU Local 521 reserves the right to monitor this blog for inappropriate postings.

I agree to the terms of this comment policy